Final Regs. Address Payments to Charities in Return for SALT Credits

Source: RSM US LLP.  PBMares is a member of RSM US Alliance. 


On Aug. 7, 2020, Treasury and the IRS released final regulations (T.D. 9907) regarding the treatment of certain payments made to section 170(c) organizations in exchange for consideration, including state or local tax credits. These regulations generally adopt proposed regulations released in December 2019.


The 2017 tax law (P.L. 115-97) added section 164(b)(6), which limits the individual income tax deduction for state and local taxes to $10,000 ($5,000 married filing separately). In response to these limitations, certain states and localities instituted tax credit programs under which taxpayers may receive credits against their state or local tax obligations in exchange for contributions to entities described in section 170(c).

On June 13, 2019, Treasury and the IRS published final regulations (T.D. 9864) providing that the receipt or expectation of a state or local tax credit in exchange for a charitable contribution constitutes a quid pro quo, which reduces the taxpayer’s charitable contribution deduction. In Rev. Proc. 2019-12, the IRS provided a safe harbor under section 162 for payments or transfers for business purposes made to organizations described in section 170(c). In Notice 2019-12, the IRS provided a safe harbor under section 164 for certain individuals that made payments to organizations described in section 170(c) in return for state or local tax credits.

Final regulations

The newly released final regulations amend existing regulations under sections 162, 164, and 170 to reflect current law and policy and adopt safe harbors established in Rev. Proc. 2019-12 and Notice 2019-12 that clarify the tax treatment of payments made to charitable organizations in exchange for state or local tax credits.

Trade or business expenses and section 162

The regulations continue to clarify that payments made to entities described in section 170(c) that bear a direct relationship to the taxpayer’s business and are made with the expectation of a commensurate financial return constitute an allowable trade or business deduction rather than a charitable contribution.

In addition, the regulations include a safe harbor for C corporations that make a cash (or cash equivalent) payment to an entity described in section 170(c) and receive (or expect to receive) a state or local tax credit in exchange. The corporation may treat such payment as an ordinary and necessary business expense to the extent of the credit received or expected to be received.

The final regulations also provide a similar safe harbor for specified pass-through entities. To qualify for the safe harbor, the entity must satisfy four requirements:

(1) The entity is a business entity other than a C corporation and is regarded for federal income tax purposes;

(2) The entity operates a trade or business within the meaning of section 162;

(3) The entity is subject to an entity-level state or local tax incurred in carrying on its trade or business; and

(4) The entity receives or expects to receive a state or local tax credit that the entity applies or expects to apply to offset an entity-level state or local tax.

However, the regulations specifically provide that the safe harbor does not apply if the credit reduces a state or local income tax.

For example, the safe harbor permits a section 162 deduction to a partnership’s payment of $1,000 to an entity described in section 170(c) in exchange for a $1,000 state tax credit that it uses to reduce its entity-level state excise tax obligation.

These amendments apply to payments made on or after Dec. 17, 2019; however, taxpayers may choose to apply the rules to payments made on or after Jan. 1, 2018.

Individual expenses and section 164

The regulations also provide a safe harbor for individuals who itemize deductions and make cash (or cash equivalent) payments to or for the use of an entity described in section 170(c) in consideration for state or local tax credits. The safe harbor permits individuals to treat the portion of a payment disallowed under section 170, as a result of the consideration received in return in the form of a state or local tax credit, to be treated as a payment of state or local tax. To the extent that the amount exceeds the individual’s state income tax liability in the year of payment, the excess may be carried forward. However, individuals remain subject to the $10,000 limit on itemized state and local income tax deductions under section 164.

These amendments apply to payments made on or after June 11, 2019; however, taxpayers may choose to apply the rules to payments made after Aug. 27, 2018.

Charitable contributions

Finally, the regulations update the quid pro quo definition under section 170 to clarify that a taxpayer is deemed to receive consideration for a payment made to an entity described in section 170(c) if at the time of the payment, the taxpayer receives or expects to receive goods or services from either the section 170(c) entity or any other party in return for its payment. Goods or services for this purpose are defined as cash, property, services, benefits, and privileges, and include state and local tax credits.

These definitions apply to amounts paid on or after Dec. 17, 2019.

This article was written by Alexandra Mitchell, Tracy Watkins, Morgan Souza and originally appeared in the 2020-08-11.
2020 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM(tm) brandmark is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.


RSM US AllianceRSM US Alliance

PBMares is a proud member of RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to the resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market.

The content of this post is accurate as of the date below. Always ensure you are reviewing the most recent information available. Contact your tax advisor if you need clarification.

2020-08-19T18:02:38-04:00August 18, 2020|Categories: Not-for-Profit, Tax: State & Local|Tags: , , |


Go to Top

As Internet Explorer will discontinue browser security updates by August of 2021, this site is best viewed using Google Chrome, Safari or Microsoft Edge.

Click to Continue