Posted by Bronach Branan , Dwight Buracker and Bradford Jones in Business Valuation, Consulting, Cloud Accounting, Process Optimization.
Key points covered in this article:
- Higher sale multiples are typically driven by long-term operational trends, not last-minute cleanup, which is why early process preparation 18 to 36 months before a sale gives owners the best chance to demonstrate lower risk and stronger business performance.
- By identifying value drivers, assigning owners, tracking KPIs, documenting SOPs, improving workflows, and organizing diligence materials early, businesses can build the kind of evidence buyers look for in a Quality of Earnings review.
- Even if a sale timeline is compressed, focused process documentation, KPI visibility, and a well-organized data room can still reduce friction, support buyer confidence, and help limit downward pressure on price.
This is the fourth and final piece in our PBMares series on getting a business ready to sell. If there’s one idea to carry out of all four articles, it’s this: value shows up in trends, not at the point of sale—give yourself enough runway to create them.
Here’s the disconnect we see all the time. Most owners picture their exit as a single number on a single day, the figure they’ve been quietly imagining for years. Buyers see something completely different. They study patterns. They want to see collections that keep getting faster, a month-end close that keeps tightening, and margins that hold steady even when the market gets choppy. None of those patterns show up in the final ninety days. They’re the cumulative result of how you run the business month after month, long before a banker ever joins the conversation.
That gap is exactly why the issue matters, and it matters most to the owner who has poured years into building something real and wants full credit for it at the finish line. The encouraging part is that the work that earns a higher multiple is the same work that makes your company easier to run on an ordinary Tuesday. Fewer fire drills now, a stronger price later. What follows is a realistic timeline, told the way an owner actually lives it, anchored to the everyday habits and management controls that ultimately shape what shows up in a Quality of Earnings (QoE) review. If you wait, you don’t have time to prove improvement—only to explain it.
Why 18 to 36 Months Is the Sweet Spot
In the first article in this series, we made the case for starting operational readiness 18 to 36 months before a sale. The logic is simple once you put yourself in the buyer’s chair: trend lines need time to form. Someone reviewing two or three years of steady improvement feels a lot calmer than someone staring at a single tidy quarter and wondering whether it was luck. That calm has a dollar value, because lower perceived risk is precisely what supports a higher multiple.
Early preparation pays off in three connected ways:
- It creates trend lines. Two years of improving key performance indicators (KPIs) tell a story a snapshot never can.
- It builds transferability. Documented processes prove the business runs on systems rather than on you, which matters enormously to a buyer who knows you’re walking out the door.
- It earns buyer confidence. That confidence quietly shrinks the “discount for the unknown” that otherwise chips away at your price.
If you’re starting late, a condensed path still exists, and we cover it in the sidebar below. But treat that path as a fallback, never a plan. The owners who command the strongest multiples are almost always the ones who gave themselves room to run. Here’s how that runway tends to unfold.
24 to 18 Months Out: Find Your Value Drivers and Start Measuring
This first stretch is the foundation phase, and it starts with clarity rather than action. Before you change a single process, you need to know what actually drives value in your business and what your current way of working costs you, often quietly, in time, errors, and rework. Most owners have a gut sense here. This process is about turning that gut sense into something you can point to.
Start by naming your true value drivers. For a distributor, that might be inventory accuracy and order fulfillment speed. For a services firm, it’s more likely billing accuracy and how well you keep your people utilized. Once you know what matters, map the top processes around those drivers, drawing on the same order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and record-to-report workflows we detailed in our four-quarter readiness program.
From there, the goal is to install a handful of measurements and the management rhythm that keeps them honest. Pick a few KPIs that actually tell you something, such as Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), the month-end close timeline, the error and rework rate, and on-time delivery. Then assign those numbers a regular place on the calendar. A short weekly working-capital huddle and a monthly KPI review create the steady attention that eventually produces a trend line. Just as important, put a name next to every core process rather than a department, because “operations owns that” is exactly the kind of answer that makes a buyer nervous. Finally, start drafting lean, one- or two-page Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for your most important workflows while the people who actually run them are still in the room.
You won’t have polished trend lines at this stage, and that’s completely fine. The point is to start the clock and capture a baseline, because you simply cannot improve what you’ve never measured. If you wait, you don’t have time to prove improvement, only to explain it.
The takeaway for this phase is straightforward: choose your value drivers, attach KPIs and owners to them, and start documenting. Everything that follows is built on this groundwork.
18 to 12 Months Out: Stabilize and Show Improvement
With baselines in place, your attention shifts from measuring to improving. This is where operating discipline starts to pay off and where a buyer would begin to recognize the pattern you’re building.
Your central task across these six months is to stabilize workflows and produce visible, quarter-over-quarter improvement in your KPIs. And here’s why that matters: a DSO that drops from 52 days to 44 over three quarters is far more persuasive than any verbal assurance about how good your collections team is. Numbers that move in the right direction, on their own, do the convincing for you. As we explained in the previous article on designing for QoE, Design for QoE, these everyday habits are exactly what protect your earnings from being normalized away later.
In practice, that means tightening the daily routines behind each metric. Collections improve when you adopt standard dispute codes and a follow-up cadence people actually stick to. The close tightens when you work from a structured month-end calendar and ask for short variance narratives that explain the “why” behind the numbers. Alongside that operational work, this is the ideal moment to clean up contract and data hygiene, precisely because there’s no pressure forcing your hand. Review your key customer and vendor agreements for assignability clauses, automatic renewals, and unusual terms, and standardize how customer and financial data is stored and named.
As those improvements take hold, begin pre-assembling your ops readiness sections, organizing SOPs, process maps, and KPI dashboards into the folder structure you’ll eventually hand to a buyer.
A quick story shows why the timing matters so much. One owner discovered during contract cleanup that several of his largest customer agreements had no assignability language at all, meaning those relationships might not transfer cleanly in a sale. Fixing it quietly, eighteen months early, removed a deal-threatening issue long before it could ever surface at the negotiating table. If you attempt to fix that same problem while a buyer is observing, it may lead to a reduction in the sale price.
The takeaway here is to turn your baselines into a visible upward trend and get your contracts and data in order while the calendar is still on your side.
12 to 6 Months Out: Run a Dry Run Diligence
Now the work turns toward testing. With a genuine trend line behind you, it’s time to see how the business holds up under buyer-style scrutiny while you still have room to fix whatever you find.
This is the stage for a dry-run diligence exercise. The single most valuable move is to simulate a realistic buyer’s request list: build a realistic diligence checklist, ask your team to produce the documents and answers against it, and pay close attention to how long it takes and where you get stuck. Those sticking points are a gift, because they point straight to the gaps worth closing now, while fixing them is cheap, rather than mid-negotiation, when it absolutely is not.
Two habits make the exercise count. First, pull your operations, finance, and tax materials together and review them as a single set, because a buyer certainly will. Coordinating these workstreams early heads off the small contradictions that quietly chip away at confidence at the table. Second, line up the banker story with your evidence so the narrative your advisor tells matches what your dashboards and SOPs actually show. When the story and the proof agree, buyers relax, and that ease translates directly into a stronger multiple.
There’s a quieter benefit, too, and it’s a human one. Owners who run a real dry run are rarely caught off guard in actual diligence, and that composure itself tells a buyer they’re dealing with a well-run business.
The takeaway is to test yourself against a real buyer’s request list, fix what breaks, and make sure your story and your evidence tell the same version of events.
6 Months Out: Lock It Down
In the final stretch, restraint matters more than reinvention. The goal is no longer to build new discipline but to protect what you’ve built and present it cleanly.
That means resisting the very natural urge to keep tinkering. Avoid last-minute process overhauls or one-off exceptions that muddy the trend lines you worked to establish. Instead, lock your SOPs by finalizing version control and naming conventions so every document is current and consistent, and finalize the Ops Readiness folder so its structure mirrors a typical buyer checklist. When the requests start arriving, you want to answer from an organized library, not scramble through a shared drive at 9 p.m.
By this point, your data room isn’t a frantic project you’re racing to finish. It’s a byproduct of how you’ve been operating all along, and that’s exactly the impression a buyer should walk away with.
The takeaway for the final six months is to stop tinkering, lock your documentation, and let your organized evidence speak for itself. The earlier you start, the more your business speaks for itself. The later you start, the more you have to explain.
Already Inside 90 Days?
If a sale is already moving and you don’t have the runway described above, resist two temptations: don’t panic, and don’t try to fabricate two years of trends you don’t have. Your aim now is simply to reduce friction.
With limited time, focus only on the moves that matter most:
- Pick 3 to 5 core processes most closely tied to your value drivers.
- Lock concise SOPs for just those processes, one or two pages each.
- Publish a single dashboard with your most important KPIs, even if it only reflects recent months.
- Build a tight index for the data room so buyers can find what they need without delay.
Be honest with yourself about what this accomplishes. It won’t create the long trend lines that command premium multiples. What it will do is reduce friction, limit surprises, and cut down on the price chips buyers take when documentation is messy. In a compressed timeline, a clean and well-organized story is your best protection.
In Conclusion
Across this series, one idea has held firm: a strong exit is the product of strong daily operations, not a last-minute cleanup. Operational readiness builds transferability, the four-quarter program builds rhythm, and design for QoE protects your earnings. The timeline above simply gives all of that work the room it needs to compound into the trend lines buyers pay more for.
This is where business process improvement and business valuation meet, and it’s why the two belong in the same conversation. Better-run processes do more than make Mondays easier; they raise the floor on what your business is worth and shrink the perceived risk that quietly discounts your price. Wherever you sit on the timeline, the next step is the same: know your runway and start building your trends.
For more information, contact Dwight Buracker, partner specializing in Business Valuations, Bronach Branan, partner specializing in Business Process Improvement, and Brad Jones, partner specializing in Outsourced Accounting Services. Together, we’ll help you build the operational and financial evidence buyers expect.
Be sure to consult with your financial or tax advisor on this topic as individual situations may vary. The information contained in this article or webinar, and any related materials, are for informational purposes only, and cannot be relied upon for legal, financial, tax, accounting, or other professional services advice. The content is provided on an “as is” basis and PBMares makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or sustainability of any information for your purposes. For any specific questions you may have, please contact us.
This content is accurate at the time of publication. Always ensure you are reviewing the most recent information available. Contact your tax or financial advisor if you need clarification.
Contact Us
About the Authors
Bradford Jones
CPA, CVA, CMA, CFF
Partner, Outsourced Accounting Team Leader
Fredericksburg
Brad provides accounting and consulting services for privately held businesses and their owners to ensure compliance, meet regulatory and financial reporting requirements.
View Bio
Bronach Branan
CPA, ACMA, CLSSGB
Partner, Risk Advisory Services
Newport News
Bronach is passionate about helping organizations streamline processes and strengthen controls.
View Bio
Dwight Buracker
CPA, CVA
Partner, Business Valuations Team Leader
Harrisonburg
Dwight has focused his practice in audit and assurance services since 2001. He has extensive experience in delivering high quality employee benefit audits to meet compliance requirements and plan goals for small businesses.
View Bio